On my kids

Featured

My kids give me joy beyond anything else.

In certain ways at least. They provide me a future. A solace in the unknown, that even though things may happen outside my control and even though I don’t know what the future holds I know that my children will be there. Their smiles. Their will. Their ability to just be themselves. I want that for them. I want that for me.

My children are a beacon of something greater than hope. Perhaps there isn’t anything greater than hope. Some say so. But to me the hope of my children is mingled with pride, and purpose, and look! There’s oozing goodness flowing out the side of the gashes from all those imperfections they carry around with them. My kids are good. My future is good. My kids are my future. Everything I do I do for my kids.

Sometimes I worry that people do things for an aspect of consciousness that doesn’t run so deep, but only exists on the surface. A want or a wish that will suffice for today, and possibly this week or month, but not forever. Also, our society seems hell bent on making the reality of now last forever, at least the reality of our minds. Our minds are not growing when we are sedated in front of a screen, being fed an algorithm’s endless cycle of reactions and emotions we don’t need to work for. Some of this is good; it’s a reprieve from reality. We all need that. But when reality itself is subsumed by this shallow facsimile it means we are tied to the present inexorably. This makes the problem of surface level goals seem both better and worse.

It’s better because folks don’t notice the problem and it keeps the pain at bay. Why does anything under the surface, motivation or learning soft skills like determination, or the ability to be wrong gracefully, or to be a good person in the face of no discernable extrinsic reason, matter? It doesn’t matter if the world is a hamster wheel of surface level experiences. We become a mirror of the world our ancestors created with their cleverness and ability to create these experiences in the first place. But we’re being hijacked by those creations to become something we have never been.

It’s worse because being hidden as a problem doesn’t make it go away, and indeed makes it difficult to understand what the goal in the first place ought to be. Humans are multi-layered things. We have motivations that run deep as well as exist on the surface. Humans are a many layered mosaic of a thing; a hydra and a gazelle, a lion and a mouse. The destruction of this is a loss, and what we are losing only we can say. The world will not care.

My kids are a motivation so deep I can barely notice it except for the glimmering reflection it makes on the surface of the ocean my life raft sits upon. They are visible as shards of color shimmering over the water’s rippling surface, like warm light from a rosy sunset. But these subtle refractions of light are visible everywhere I look once I know to look for them. On every surface I see a subtle hint of light influenced from my children’s presence deep beneath the surface. Everywhere I look I see my kids. My kids are in everything when I look out at the vast sea. While I travel, while I do, while I work and grow and be a person they can be proud of. I see others living, and I find myself yearning for my kids to get on their life raft one day. I want them to live and love, laugh and play, to have something coming up to them from the deep. If perhaps I also am a sea of glimmering shards to them one day, then I will be doing my part to foster that motivation and meaning that travels up to them from the deep.

Perhaps living forever is possible. Perhaps the lives of those we’ve lost are still there, only they are beneath the surface. Perhaps what we are losing in our shallowness is something more.. the lives of those before us. Life isn’t just what we see on the surface, because what you see is also what is below whether or not we are aware of that. For me, my depth is my kids.

I love my kids. They are everything to me.

In Memoriam

Sarah started coming to. She felt the heavy weight of sleep gum her eyes together, and she struggled to open them. The technician said “Welcome back to the real world”, pulling the headset from her head.

Sarah began to realize where she was.

I’m no longer in his memory, she thought. She felt a sense of loss, but also felt a sense of relief. She was glad to be back in the real world, but she also missed the feeling of being her father.

I wonder how he decided which memories to share with me. They felt so real to her, like she was her father, not just seeing the memories of him but being the memories of him…

I was sitting in that old blue leather chair like they used to make them, holding Sarah in my arms. She was so small and fragile, and I felt like I would crush the little one if I wasn’t careful. But she was also so beautiful, and I couldn’t help but smile as I looked down at her.

He really loved me. Thought Sarah..

“There she is”, I pointed out to my wife. Sarah was across the park playing in the jungle gym. She was happy and carefree. She ran around with her friends, laughing and playing games. We were always there, watching over her and making sure she was safe.

As she got up from the chair, she decided she would sign the paperwork. She began to read & fill out the forms.

I, [your name], being of sound mind and body, do hereby consent to the sharing of my memories with [memory beneficiary’s name], upon my death. I understand that this means that the beneficiary will be able to access the memories previously collected from [see attached], and relive my experiences through the use of a memory sharing device.

Memory sharing is a powerful tool, but by signing this form, you accept the following risks involved to your beneficiaries, such as:

  • Detachment from one’s own memories. When people share memories, they are essentially taking on the perspective of the person whose memory they are sharing. This can make it difficult for people to remember their own experiences and to distinguish between what is real and what is not.
  • Trauma. Memory sharing can be a traumatic experience for some people. If you are considering sharing a memory, it is important to be aware of the potential risks and to make sure that you prepare your beneficiaries for the emotional impact.
  • Loss of privacy. When you share a memory, you are essentially giving someone else access to your personal experiences. This can be a risky proposition, especially if you are sharing a memory that is sensitive in nature.

This consent form was signed on [date].

[Signature]

In Memoriam™ 2079

After the long series of signatures and formalities, she handed the forms to the technician, and began to cry. 

I stood there, signing the paperwork, accepting the risk for my memories that would be shown Sarah. I felt empty inside. Is this all that’s left of me? The mere memory of my existence, as played on my daughter’s mind? Is that all that our limited species can muster? Is that all “immortality” is? Screw you, Musk Sin Claro. My body is dying and all that lives on will be a measly mental recording.

“Take your time, miss,” the technician said. “I’ll give you the room for a while” and left the room.

My wife drove us home. We held hands in the car. I thought about video calling Sarah and Jack. Seeing the life of my life is all the meaning I need. I wonder when she’ll decide to replay my memories..

After a period of time, it could have been a moment or hours, Sarah blinked back her tears. She wiped the wetness on her sleeve. She stood up to go.

Sarah took the taxi to pick up her son, Jack, from school on her way home. Jack was named after her dad. Though her dad’s name was John, she preferred to call him just “Jack”.

“How was school?” She asked.

grunt. 

“That good, huh?”

A wild exasperated facial expression appeared. 

“I love you.”

“Mom, can we please just listen to the ‘Moon Kids’ memory?”

“Of course, honey” and she pressed play on the headset. The memory began to play.

How did he get so big? Sarah thought. She still remembered when Jack was born; As a premature baby, he basically fit in her single hand, his arm as big as her finger. She remembered when he came home. She remembered the first time he said “I love you, Mommy”. She remembered those and all the other memories she had chosen for him: seeing him on his first day of school, when he rode a bike for the first time, when he read a story to her for the first time…

She felt so blessed, but then felt the pang of reality. The oncologist results… how can I possibly tell Jack about it?

She knew that she had to tell him, but she didn’t know how. She didn’t want to scare him, but she also didn’t want to lie to him. Sarah decided to tell Jack the truth…

Jack started coming to. He felt the heavy weight of sleep gum his eyes together, and he struggled to open them. The technician said “Welcome back to the real world”, pulling the headset from his head.

EDIT: This short story was written with the help of Bard

On Short Story Puns: #1

There was Stanley, and there was Yelnats. They were good friends who enjoyed Sumo Wrestling. There was a big match coming up between Gluteus Maximus and Hamstrung Diddly Squat. It was predicted to be a rout. Maximus was favored 1 million to 1. Maximus bragged that he would feature a new knockout move in the upcoming match against Diddly Squat.

The day of the match came, and Stanley and Yelnats were excited with anticipation about what the new move might be. The bout started, and all anyone saw was Maximus shift his weight, engage his glutes, and sent Diddly Squat flying out of the ring. Stanley and Yelnats were shocked, stunned, they couldn’t believe what they just saw.

At the same time Stanley said “Weird flex, but O.K.” while Yelnats said “K.O. butt flex… weird”.

On Expectation

Am I expected to know?

My children are here, and I find myself in this inexplicable situation. My body acts as though it has been planning this for a long time. And I am sitting here, watching my body act it out. My children are whining, or else refusing vegetables, and my body’s voice echoes out of my body’s mouth, commanding my children to do what they refuse to do.

But why, though? Why does my body act this way, as though an unseen stranger tugs at my strings? I don’t know, any more than I did when I was their age. What actually is happening here? Does my body have some wisdom that it’s trying to impart? Does my body know things that I don’t?

Why does my body act this way: calm, confident, controlled? My body doesn’t know, does it? Does it only think it knows things? Where is this coming from? It is as though my body is channeling some invisible force. Some unseen, unconscious, unknowable, ethic.

Is this a good thing? Shouldn’t I make sure that my children know how little I actually know? Wake up!

I love my children. I love my wife. I love my body. I love my life.

But what am I to do? Do I act out these things? Do I control them? Come to understand more of my unconscious ethic. Do I muse from the armchair behind the veil, telling my body what to do from afar? Or do I accept that I don’t know, and engage more fully? What am I to do?

My life might slip by if I am not careful. And I am still sitting back here, wondering what is happening. Watch my body act out its life while my mind views from the sidelines as though it’s watching a television program.

On the other hand, I could work to fuse mind and body, body and mind, such that these are no longer distinguishable. What’s more, my mind, fused with the body as it would be, wouldn’t have a clue that it didn’t have a clue. Is this really better? Is certainty, day after day, time after time, when I really haven’t a clue, palatable? Certainly it can’t be. Ignorance cannot be an acceptable price for bliss.

Hold on, though. Couldn’t I construct yet another mind outside the microcosm of this mind/body duality to keep watch. Another proctor. A watcher of the watcher. Yes, there would be more control, but more too would there be distance, with life slipping like water through my tightly clenched fingers. What am I expected to do? What are we expected to do?

Perhaps a balance, then? But what is this balance? Where do I find it? Who is telling me this right now? What is happening? It’s been 30 minutes. My neglected body and its surroundings are still consummately iterating through their time, totally and absolutely apathetic to the storm raging within this particular corner of consciousness. I must get back. I must keep looking for the balance. And, forgive my presumption, but I think it’s likely that you probably should, as well.

On Maus: A No Spoiler Book Review

I am in awe. Speechless. How can this have actually happened? What a treasure this book is to be alive and in my hands. To know. To remember. Something as important to remember as this. Bless you, Art Spiegelman. You have given something wonderful to the world.

The art style is fantastic. I truly felt present with the son interviewing his father. The characters are real. I couldn’t put the book down. You must read this book.

I give Maus, by Art Spiegelman, 5 stars

On Catch-22. A No Spoiler Book Review

This books redeeming quality is that it gives the reader something they cannot get from many places: an accurate window into the mind of someone recovering from the psychological torture of war, who happens to have a refreshing sense of humor that wraps well into the nihilism of the narrative. Even more unusually, this book is a wonderfully, lighthearted read compared to other stories of war you can find. Absurd fiction is a good way to capture the essence of the silliness of war. Circular logic is everywhere in the narrative, from the inescapable personal duty of a bombardier to the trapping logic keeping those in charge under a spell of responsibilities, and even they don’t understand the reasons they have them. It’s catch 22 all the way down.

Ok, with that said. This book is long. So. Long. It covers the same stories many times. The story is written out of order, but not artfully so. It’s just confusing for the sake of it. It has the quality of that friend from college that is esoteric to try and sound smart. It’s NOT well written, no matter how many people that are smarter than me tell me otherwise. The same points can be made with a tighter narrative, with a smaller page count, and with less meandering through spacetime. There are too few hints from the author for a first time reader to easily follow where in the story they are. If this is intended, then maybe the book isn’t for me. Intentionally obtuse writing is not for me. The book isn’t an epoch across many times and many places. It’s all in the span of a few years but the way it’s written you’d think the story was actually complicated when it’s not. I’ve read science fiction stories that cover millennia that are easier to follow for eff’s sake. The story is straightforward. Only the character development is a bit involved, and this too was done in clunky ways. Thank goodness I laughed in several places throughout, because otherwise the read would have been even more incredibly painful.

Another thing is this book shows its age. A lot. Every female character introduced has a perfunctory description of her boobs and butt and only then her face, and only THEN do we learn about the actually interesting things she’s about to present to the story. Oh did I say interesting? I meant entirely sexist. All female stories are driven by how they make men feel. Ew. Lots of allusions to sex and in ways that are not tasteful in 2022. Among them is the rape of 2 girls in a college fraternity, the social acceptance of pedophilia (so long as it’s a girl from some poor family, and not a respectful family, this seems OK by the characters at several places in the story). One character’s only mission is to take pictures up girls skirts. Another falls in love with a whore (which is a KEY plot point throughout), and at one point he feels proud, like having a family, to take “his” whore and her kid sister out to breakfast. This is weird. Because these norms were so out of date, I couldn’t tell in many parts what was a joke, but even if the catch-22 joke of how college women cannot get out of rape, because if they didn’t consent to rape their parents would be TOLD they slept with all the guys, is a joke it’s definitely not in good taste.

I hope this stops being a classic.

I give this book 2 out of 5 stars.

ANONYMOUS Poll: How Private do you want your Information Diet?

Link to Survey: How Private do you want your Information Diet?

I apologize for the digression beyond my typical posts; I’m just very curious. It occurred to me that our information feeds are highly personalized nowadays, but I wonder if people also feel that they are private? Please share around if you are also curious. I’ll share the anonymous results once I have some.

Do you consider your information feed personal? If others saw what you were reading on your device, would that make you uncomfortable?

source: https://slate.com/technology/2018/05/in-defense-of-peeking-at-a-strangers-iphone-screen.html

Link to Survey: How Private do you want your Information Diet?

On Funky Calculators

Have you ever wondered what Machine Learning (ML) is? I don’t mean technically, but just an easy-to-understand idea of what it really is? Well, in a few minutes, you will. Machine Learning is the problem, not you.

Consider this simple sentence: ML is ________. If you ask people to fill in the blank, the answers you get today are pitiful.

Asking a technical person is a nightmare: “no explicit instructions” … “algorithm” … “statistical models” … “inferences” blah blah blah. How silly is this? Do we do this with literally any other idea? Consider this sentence: “Dishwashers are ________”. No one reading this thinks the answer should have anything to do with brushless motors or pressure valves, and shouldn’t even include the word “water” for God’s sake. Dishwashers are “machines that clean dishes”. No, even simpler. Dirty dishes in, clean dishes out. Not complicated.

Ok, you say to yourself. This isn’t a big problem, is it? Only technical people really deal with machine learning. It doesn’t affect me, right? Wrong. Machine learning is in almost every piece of technology you are using today, and many people don’t understand what it is. Let’s fix that. I promise you can understand what ML is if you read the rest of the post. At least you will understand it well enough to have well-informed, non-technical conversations about it.

If you ask a non-technical person today what ML is, you are likely to get one of the following not-so-inspiring answers.

  • Reddit: Smart robots will ruin the world! Humans run for the hills! The iRobot Terminator is coming for you! Raaahr, dystopia! Armageddon outta here!
  • CEOs on cable news: ML is an economic catalyst that will ensure the future prosperity of …. I tune out here and think sardonically: “look at all those trillions of dollars waiting to be poured into a swimming pool and dived into! Doesn’t that excite you about the future? I mean, who doesn’t want to be Scrooge McDuck?
  • Documentaries: ML is brainwashing us. Everyone is getting stupider. All jobs are leaving us. You are meaningless in the future of AI. Go back to doom scrolling through autogenerated fields of misinformation.

None of these answers are the “right” answer. Just as an ant hill should not be thought of as “a mound of dirt with a vertical hole in its center”, nor “a nuisance to a well-kept baseball field”, so too should ML not be thought of in terms of just its bare-metal or constituent parts, nor in terms of the problems that it creates. ML is a tool. We need a new way of talking about ML. We need poets, artists, writers, businesspeople, store owners, bus drivers, kindergarten teachers, and … everybody to understand what ML really is. What is it? Well…

ML is a Funky Calculator.

In fact, ML programs really have many regular calculators AND many funky calculators, but to understand what makes ML different is to understand that it introduces a new trick: funky calculators. Huh? To understand, let’s first think about what a regular calculator is. A regular calculator takes numbers “in” and an operation “op”, and then computes more numbers “out”. 3+4=7 to a calculator, is: (3 in) (+ op) (4 in) = (7 out). It takes “3+4” and computes 7.

IN (3, 4) OP (+) = OUT (7)

Now a funky calculator is different. Instead of computing the OUT from and IN and an OP, a funky calculator computes the OP from the INs and the OUTs. To a funky calculator, this looks like (3 in) (4 in) (7 out) = (+ op).

IN (3, 4) OUT (7) = OP (+)

Put another way,

  • Calculator: inputs & operation in, output out
  • Funky calculator: inputs & outputs in, operation out

This is really strange, but it’s also quite powerful. For all of human history, humans have had to define AND run our own operations. With the advent of computers, we started writing down the operations as programs to be executed by computers and/or robots. Now with funky calculators, we are telling computers to generate AND run these operations without any human ever deciding whether a particular operation it generates is a good idea to run in the first place.

Brief technical aside (you can skip this paragraph if you want to). Keep in mind that in my example the “operation” is just a mere “+”. However, these operations are typically much more complicated, and eventually these operations will be entire computer programs. Also keep in mind that ML needs many examples of inputs and outputs to produce an operation (sometimes millions or billions of examples in the case of quite complex operations). TL;DR here: more data = more accurate operation. Lastly, what I call an “operation” is commonly referred to as a “model” in ML lingo. If you see “model” anywhere else, just translate this into “operation”. These are the same thing. OK, technical aside over.

So far, ML is already powerful enough that it computes the operation that takes a Go board as input, and produces the win/lose probability as output. It computes the operation which turns millions of tiny squares of color into a phrase of the likely object that those squares of color represent. It computes the operation that turns your user profile and millions of Youtube videos into a list of the most likely of those videos that you will want to watch. That’s it. It’s funky calculators all the way down. With just regular calculators, all of this is still possible (in theory), but it would require people to program those operations (programs). In practice, these operations are too complicated for people figure out by themselves. Funky calculators automate this operation-generating process, and this means creating these operations is much faster and cheaper than it used to be. This, in turn, makes more complicated operations possible, and thus makes computers more and more capable.

Until very recently, there were always people in the loop figuring out what operations had to be in place to decide whether to hire or fire people, or to determine what information people should see in their news feed. But now, funky calculators are able to compute these operations for us. No people required! Yay! CEOs rejoice in your Scrooge McDuck money pits! Oh wait. Shit. There are no people in the loop? You mean we have computers, entirely unsupervised, generating and executing operations on our phones and computers on behalf of corporations and often there is no human on earth that understands the operations being performed? Yep. You got it. Funky calculators are all over the place in our world and much of the time we have insufficient human processes in place to make sure they adhere to our values.

We need to reign in the funky calculators.

What are the solutions? I have many ideas, but the first thing to do is to have virtually everybody understand what ML even is. Only then can society have common sense conversations on what to do about the problems it creates.

ML is just some funky calculators. Data in. Operation out. 

Thanks for reading.

P.S. If you are a graphic artist and want to take a stab at helping people visualize funky calculators, please reach out to me. You can make a difference if you can help more people understand the sentence “ML is a funky calculator.”

P.P.S. If you are a technical person and want to be pedantically correct about my definitions, feel free to lambaste me in the comments. I am aware that ML doesn’t literally produce a “+” as an operation, for instance, and NLP applications actually are quite bad at math, but this is all irrelevant to understanding what ML is. If you have a better way to explain it, also feel free drop a comment.

On Numbness

I wrote this a few days ago, but I couldn’t bring myself to publish it. If there’s one thing I hate while I’m overcome with numbness, it’s someone telling me “it’s OK”. But now that this mood has passed, publishing it feels less terrible. To anyone else feeling this way, you aren’t alone.


Sometimes it’s hard to get out of bed. Sometimes it’s hard to do the right thing. Sometimes it’s hard to do anything at all. Sometimes it’s hard to admit that it’s hard.

Now is one of those times.

Typing. Staring. Looking into the void. Switching tabs. Passing time. Attempting to penetrate the numbness. It’s all just so pointless.

I hope you are having a good day. Mine is not such a good one. It should be. But it isn’t.